C-60 vs Xeon E7320

C-60 vs Xeon E7320 Performance Spectrum

C-60

2 / 2

1,483

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E7320

1,469

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-60 vs Xeon E7320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-60 vs Xeon E7320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-60

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 80W, a 71W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6290, while Xeon E7320 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Xeon E7320 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E7320

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,469 vs 1,483).
❌788.9% higher power demand at 80W vs 9W.
❌No integrated graphics, while C-60 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is C-60 better than Xeon E7320?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7320 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while C-60 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, C-60 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, C-60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

C-60 is the better buy right now. C-60 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

C-60 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

C-60 vs Xeon E7320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-60

The C-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,483 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E7320

The Xeon E7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,469 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The C-60 is built on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. In PassMark, the C-60 scores 1,483 against the Xeon E7320's 1,469 — a 0.9% lead for the C-60. L3 cache: 0 kB on the C-60 vs 4 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7320.

Feature	C-60	Xeon E7320
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	—
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.13 GHz+113%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	40 nm-38%	65 nm
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	—
PassMark	1,483	1,469