Core 2 Duo U7500
VS
Core 2 Extreme X7900

Core 2 Duo U7500 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900

Intel

Core 2 Duo U7500

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.06 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Core 2 Extreme X7900

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo U7500 is positioned at rank 1051 and the Core 2 Extreme X7900 is on rank 1162, so the Core 2 Duo U7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7500

#1039
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2629%
#1040
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2591%
#1041
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2378%
#1042
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2367%
#1043
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2346%
#1045
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2265%
#1046
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2172%
#1047
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2168%
#1048
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2110%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
99%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
99%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
98%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
97%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
97%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
97%
#1059
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
96%
#1060
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
96%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
96%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
94%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme X7900

#1150
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4185%
#1151
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4124%
#1152
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3786%
#1153
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3769%
#1154
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3734%
#1156
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3606%
#1157
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3458%
#1158
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3452%
#1159
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3359%
#1162
Core 2 Extreme X7900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1163
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
98%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1167
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1168
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
97%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
95%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
93%
#1177
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Extreme X7900 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo U7500 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo U7500Core 2 Extreme X7900
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo U7500Core 2 Extreme X7900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core 2 Extreme X7900

Intel

Core 2 Duo U7500

The Core 2 Duo U7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 1.06 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core 2 Extreme X7900

The Core 2 Extreme X7900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $851.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core 2 Extreme X7900 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.06 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7500 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X7900 — a 90.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Extreme X7900 (base: 1.06 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core 2 Duo U7500 uses the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme X7900 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo U7500 scores 1,116 against the Core 2 Extreme X7900's 1,115 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo U7500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7500Core 2 Extreme X7900
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.06 GHz
2.8 GHz+164%
Base Clock
1.06 GHz
2.8 GHz+164%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,116
1,115
Geekbench 6 Single
180
Geekbench 6 Multi
320
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo U7500 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Extreme X7900 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-533 memory speed. The Core 2 Extreme X7900 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7500Core 2 Extreme X7900
Socket
BGA479
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 2 Extreme X7900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x virtualization. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo U7500 targets Ultra Low Voltage Laptop, Core 2 Extreme X7900 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7500Core 2 Extreme X7900
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Ultra Low Voltage Laptop
Mobile