Athlon II X2 245 vs Core 2 Duo U7500
Athlon II X2 245
Core 2 Duo U7500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 245 is positioned at rank 862 and the Core 2 Duo U7500 is on rank 1051, so the Athlon II X2 245 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 245
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X2 245 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X2 245 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+48%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 245 and Core 2 Duo U7500
Athlon II X2 245
The Athlon II X2 245 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,134 points. Launch price was $35.
Core 2 Duo U7500
The Core 2 Duo U7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 1.06 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 245 and Core 2 Duo U7500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245 versus 1.06 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7500 — a 92.9% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.06 GHz). The Athlon II X2 245 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo U7500 uses Merom-2048 (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 245 scores 1,134 against the Core 2 Duo U7500's 1,116 — a 1.6% lead for the Athlon II X2 245. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+174% | 1.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+174% | 1.06 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,134+2% | 1,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 180 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 320 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 245 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo U7500 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 245 versus DDR2-533 on the Core 2 Duo U7500 — the Athlon II X2 245 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 245 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 2 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 245) and GM965,945GME (Core 2 Duo U7500).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+66550% | DDR2-533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 2 GB+13107100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 245) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo U7500). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo U7500 targets Ultra Low Voltage Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 245 rivals Pentium E5500.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Ultra Low Voltage Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X2 245 launched at $66 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo U7500 debuted at $100. At current prices ($15 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo U7500 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 245 delivers 75.6 pts/$ vs 111.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo U7500 — making the Core 2 Duo U7500 the 38.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $66-34% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 75.6 | 111.6+48% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 245 and Core 2 Duo U7500
