
Athlon II X2 245

Atom x5-Z8550
Athlon II X2 245 vs Atom x5-Z8550 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 245 vs Atom x5-Z8550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 245 vs Atom x5-Z8550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 245
2009Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Atom x5-Z8550.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom x5-Z8550 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,134 vs 1,143).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $66 MSRP, while Atom x5-Z8550 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-Z8550 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Atom x5-Z8550
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while Athlon II X2 245 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 245.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom x5-Z8550 better than Athlon II X2 245?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 245 vs Atom x5-Z8550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 245
The Athlon II X2 245 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,134 points. Launch price was $35.

Atom x5-Z8550
The Atom x5-Z8550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,143 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X2 245 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x5-Z8550 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-Z8550 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245 versus 2.4 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8550 — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.44 GHz). The Athlon II X2 245 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom x5-Z8550 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 245 scores 1,134 against the Atom x5-Z8550's 1,143 — a 0.8% lead for the Atom x5-Z8550. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Atom x5-Z8550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+21% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+101% | 1.44 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Cherry Trail (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,134 | 1,143 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 245 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom x5-Z8550 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 245 versus LPDDR3-1600 on the Atom x5-Z8550 — the Atom x5-Z8550 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 245 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 245) vs 2 (Atom x5-Z8550) — the Atom x5-Z8550 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 245) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x5-Z8550).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Atom x5-Z8550 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | UTFCBGA1380 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | LPDDR3-1600+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 2 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 245) / not specified (Atom x5-Z8550). The Atom x5-Z8550 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Athlon II X2 245 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 245 rivals Pentium E5500.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Atom x5-Z8550 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















