
Athlon II X2 245

Athlon II X2 245e
Athlon II X2 245 vs Athlon II X2 245e Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 245 vs Athlon II X2 245e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 245 vs Athlon II X2 245e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 245
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($66 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($66 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon II X2 245e.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X2 245e across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,134 vs 1,141).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Athlon II X2 245e
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $66 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 245.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 245e better than Athlon II X2 245?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 245 vs Athlon II X2 245e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 245
The Athlon II X2 245 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,134 points. Launch price was $35.

Athlon II X2 245e
The Athlon II X2 245e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 245 and Athlon II X2 245e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245 versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245e — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). Both are built on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 245 scores 1,134 against the Athlon II X2 245e's 1,141 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X2 245e. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Athlon II X2 245e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,134 | 1,141 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 319 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 741 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM3 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 245) and 760G,770,780G,785G,790FX,790GX (Athlon II X2 245e).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Athlon II X2 245e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 245) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X2 245e). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 245e targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 245 rivals Pentium E5500; Athlon II X2 245e rivals Athlon II X2 270u.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Athlon II X2 245e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 245 was priced at $66, while the Athlon II X2 245e came in at $87. On launch pricing ($66 vs $87), Athlon II X2 245 was $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 245 delivers 17.2 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 245e — making the Athlon II X2 245 the 26.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Athlon II X2 245e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $66-24% | $87 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2+31% | 13.1 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















