Athlon II X2 245 vs Pentium G640T

Athlon II X2 245 vs Pentium G640T Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 245

2 / 2

1,134

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G640T

2 / 2

1,139

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 245 vs Pentium G640T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 245 vs Pentium G640T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 245

2009

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium G640T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,134 vs 1,139).
❌
3.1% HIGHER MSRP
$66 MSRPvs$64 MSRP
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Pentium G640T

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $66 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 245.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G640T better than Athlon II X2 245?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 245 is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G640T pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G640T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G640T is the better buy right now. Pentium G640T comes in $2 cheaper on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $66 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon II X2 245 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 3.6% better value on MSRP (17.8 vs 17.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G640T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 245 vs Pentium G640T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 245

The Athlon II X2 245 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,134 points. Launch price was $35.

Pentium G640T

The Pentium G640T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,139 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 245 and Pentium G640T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G640T — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon II X2 245 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G640T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 245 scores 1,134 against the Pentium G640T's 1,139 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium G640T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 245 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G640T.

Feature	Athlon II X2 245	Pentium G640T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+21%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+21%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,134	1,139

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 245 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G640T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II X2 245	Pentium G640T
Socket	AM3	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 245) / not specified (Pentium G640T). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 245 rivals Pentium E5500.

Feature	Athlon II X2 245	Pentium G640T
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 245 was priced at $66, while the Pentium G640T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($66 vs $64), Pentium G640T was $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 245 delivers 17.2 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G640T — making the Pentium G640T the 3.5% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X2 245	Pentium G640T
MSRP	$66	$64-3%
Performance per Dollar	17.2	17.8+3%
Release Date	2009	2012

Search Athlon II X2 245 on Amazon

Search Pentium G640T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.