A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 245

A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 245 Performance Spectrum

A4-3300

2 / 2

1,143

+0.8%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X2 245

2 / 2

1,134

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3300

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6410D, while Athlon II X2 245 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon II X2 245

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4-3300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,134 vs 1,143).
❌Launch MSRP is still $66 MSRP, while A4-3300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-3300 better than Athlon II X2 245?

Yes. A4-3300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-3300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-3300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-3300 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-3300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $66 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II X2 245 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (17.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-3300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3300

The A4-3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,143 points. Launch price was $50.

Athlon II X2 245

The Athlon II X2 245 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,134 points. Launch price was $35.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-3300 and Athlon II X2 245 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3300 versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245 — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A4-3300 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 245 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3300 scores 1,143 against the Athlon II X2 245's 1,134 — a 0.8% lead for the A4-3300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-3300	Athlon II X2 245
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB+300%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark	1,143	1,134
Geekbench 6 Single	266	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3300 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 245 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-3300 versus 1333 on the Athlon II X2 245 — the A4-3300 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-3300) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 245) — the A4-3300 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A4-3300) and AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 245).

Feature	A4-3300	Athlon II X2 245
Socket	FM1	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-3300) vs true (Athlon II X2 245). The A4-3300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6410D), while the Athlon II X2 245 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-3300 rivals Celeron G530; Athlon II X2 245 rivals Pentium E5500.