Core 2 Duo U7600 vs A4-1250
Core 2 Duo U7600
A4-1250
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo U7600 is positioned at rank 1206 and the A4-1250 is on rank 1023, so the A4-1250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7600
Performance Per Dollar A4-1250
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo U7600 | A4-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo U7600 | A4-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+502%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo U7600 and A4-1250
Core 2 Duo U7600
The Core 2 Duo U7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,263 points. Launch price was $249.
A4-1250
The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo U7600 and A4-1250 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7600 versus 1 GHz on the A4-1250 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo U7600. The Core 2 Duo U7600 uses the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the A4-1250 uses Temash (2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo U7600 scores 1,263 against the A4-1250's 1,258 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo U7600. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo U7600 | A4-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz+20% | 1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) | Temash (2013) |
| PassMark | 1,263 | 1,258 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 111 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 188 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo U7600 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A4-1250 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo U7600 | A4-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA479 | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3L 1333 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo U7600) / true (A4-1250). The A4-1250 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Core 2 Duo U7600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo U7600 | A4-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon HD 8210 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Tablet |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo U7600 launched at $250 MSRP, while the A4-1250 debuted at $100. At current prices ($5 vs $30), the Core 2 Duo U7600 is $25 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo U7600 delivers 252.6 pts/$ vs 41.9 pts/$ for the A4-1250 — making the Core 2 Duo U7600 the 143.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo U7600 | A4-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $100-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-83% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 252.6+503% | 41.9 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo U7600 and A4-1250
