Core 2 Duo U7600
VS
Pentium SU2700

Core 2 Duo U7600 vs Pentium SU2700

Intel

Core 2 Duo U7600

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Pentium SU2700

1 Cores1 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo U7600 is positioned at rank 1206 and the Pentium SU2700 is on rank 1022, so the Pentium SU2700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7600

#1194
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5810%
#1195
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5725%
#1196
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5255%
#1197
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5232%
#1198
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5184%
#1200
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5006%
#1201
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4800%
#1202
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4792%
#1203
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4663%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
100%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
98%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
97%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
94%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
92%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
91%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
91%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
90%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
88%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
88%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium SU2700

#1010
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2314%
#1011
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2280%
#1012
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2093%
#1013
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2084%
#1014
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2065%
#1016
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1994%
#1017
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1912%
#1018
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1909%
#1019
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1857%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
99%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
98%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
96%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
95%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium SU2700 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo U7600 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo U7600Pentium SU2700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core 2 Duo U7600 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $5 (vs $10), it costs 50% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 99% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium SU2700.
InsightCore 2 Duo U7600Pentium SU2700
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+99%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo U7600 and Pentium SU2700

Intel

Core 2 Duo U7600

The Core 2 Duo U7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,263 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo U7600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core 2 Duo U7600 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7600 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 8% clock advantage for the Pentium SU2700 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core 2 Duo U7600 uses the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo U7600 scores 1,263 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium SU2700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7600Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
1.3 GHz+8%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
1.3 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Process
65 nm
45 nm-31%
Architecture
Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,263
1,268
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo U7600 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7600Pentium SU2700
Socket
BGA479
BGA956
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo U7600 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Pentium SU2700 debuted at $100. At current prices ($5 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo U7600 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo U7600 delivers 252.6 pts/$ vs 126.8 pts/$ for the Pentium SU2700 — making the Core 2 Duo U7600 the 66.3% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7600Pentium SU2700
MSRP
$250
$100-60%
Avg Price (30d)
$5-50%
$10
Performance per Dollar
252.6+99%
126.8
Release Date
2006
2009