Celeron 847 vs Core 2 Duo U7600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 847 vs Core 2 Duo U7600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 847 vs Core 2 Duo U7600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 847

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $116 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 87.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 5.1 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Core 2 Duo U7600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌750% higher power demand at 17W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo U7600

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 17W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,263 vs 1,270).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 847 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 847 better than Core 2 Duo U7600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo U7600 is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 847 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 847 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 847 is the better buy right now. Celeron 847 comes in $116 cheaper on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo U7600 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 87.6% better value on MSRP (9.5 vs 5.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 847 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 847 vs Core 2 Duo U7600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

Core 2 Duo U7600

The Core 2 Duo U7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,263 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 847 and Core 2 Duo U7600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 versus 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7600 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo U7600 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron 847 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo U7600 uses Merom-2048 (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 847 scores 1,270 against the Core 2 Duo U7600's 1,263 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 847. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo U7600.

Feature	Celeron 847	Core 2 Duo U7600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	1.2 GHz+9%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.2 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,270	1,263
Geekbench 6 Single	196	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	354	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 847 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo U7600 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 847	Core 2 Duo U7600
Socket	BGA1023	BGA479
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 847) / not specified (Core 2 Duo U7600). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo U7600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron 847	Core 2 Duo U7600
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 847 was priced at $134, while the Core 2 Duo U7600 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($134 vs $250), Celeron 847 was $116 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 847 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 5.1 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo U7600 — making the Celeron 847 the 60.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 847	Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP	$134-46%	$250
Performance per Dollar	9.5+86%	5.1
Release Date	2011	2006

Search Celeron 847 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo U7600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.