Celeron 847 vs Pentium SU2700

Intel

Celeron 847

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium SU2700

1 Cores1 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 847 vs Pentium SU2700 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 847 vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 847 vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 847

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium SU2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 70% higher power demand at 17W vs 10W.

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $34 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
  • Delivers 33.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.7 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
  • Draws 10W instead of 17W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,268 vs 1,270).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron 847 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium SU2700 better than Celeron 847?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium SU2700 is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 847 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 847 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium SU2700 is the better buy right now. Pentium SU2700 comes in $34 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 847 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 33.8% better value on MSRP (12.7 vs 9.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 847 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 847 vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron 847 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 847 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Pentium SU2700 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron 847 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 847 scores 1,270 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron 847. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847 vs 0 kB on the Pentium SU2700.

FeatureCeleron 847Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.1 GHz
1.3 GHz+18%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
1.3 GHz+18%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+12700%
2 MB
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,270
1,268
Geekbench 6 Single
196
Geekbench 6 Multi
354
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 847 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 847Pentium SU2700
Socket
BGA1023
BGA956
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 847) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium SU2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron 847Pentium SU2700
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 847 was priced at $134, while the Pentium SU2700 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($134 vs $100), Pentium SU2700 was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 847 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 12.7 pts/$ for the Pentium SU2700 — making the Pentium SU2700 the 28.9% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 847Pentium SU2700
MSRP
$134
$100-25%
Performance per Dollar
9.5
12.7+34%
Release Date
2011
2009

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.