
Celeron 847

Pentium SU2700
Celeron 847 vs Pentium SU2700 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 847 vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 847 vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 847
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium SU2700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌70% higher power demand at 17W vs 10W.
Pentium SU2700
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 33.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.7 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 17W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,268 vs 1,270).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 847 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium SU2700 better than Celeron 847?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 847 vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 847
The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

Pentium SU2700
The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron 847 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 847 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Pentium SU2700 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron 847 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 847 scores 1,270 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron 847. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847 vs 0 kB on the Pentium SU2700.
| Feature | Celeron 847 | Pentium SU2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,270 | 1,268 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 196 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 354 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 847 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 847 | Pentium SU2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 847) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium SU2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Celeron 847 | Pentium SU2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 847 was priced at $134, while the Pentium SU2700 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($134 vs $100), Pentium SU2700 was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 847 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 12.7 pts/$ for the Pentium SU2700 — making the Pentium SU2700 the 28.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 847 | Pentium SU2700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134 | $100-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.5 | 12.7+34% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














