Celeron 847 vs Pentium SU2700
Celeron 847
Pentium SU2700
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 847 is positioned at rank 1093 and the Pentium SU2700 is on rank 1022, so the Pentium SU2700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 847
Performance Per Dollar Pentium SU2700
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 847 | Pentium SU2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 847 | Pentium SU2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+50%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 847 and Pentium SU2700
Celeron 847
The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.
Pentium SU2700
The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron 847 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 847 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Pentium SU2700 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron 847 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 847 scores 1,270 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron 847. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847 vs 0 kB on the Pentium SU2700.
| Feature | Celeron 847 | Pentium SU2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,270 | 1,268 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 196 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 354 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 847 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 847 | Pentium SU2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 847) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium SU2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Celeron 847 | Pentium SU2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 847 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Pentium SU2700 debuted at $100. At current prices ($15 vs $10), the Pentium SU2700 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 847 delivers 84.7 pts/$ vs 126.8 pts/$ for the Pentium SU2700 — making the Pentium SU2700 the 39.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 847 | Pentium SU2700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134 | $100-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.7 | 126.8+50% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 847 and Pentium SU2700
