Celeron 847
VS
Xeon X5260

Celeron 847 vs Xeon X5260

Intel

Celeron 847

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2011
VS

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 847 is positioned at rank 1093 and the Xeon X5260 is on rank 956, so the Xeon X5260 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 847

#1081
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3095%
#1082
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3050%
#1083
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2800%
#1084
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2787%
#1085
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2761%
#1087
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2667%
#1088
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2557%
#1089
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2553%
#1090
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2484%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5260

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
32523%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6141%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5456%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4215%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
100%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
98%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
96%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
95%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
95%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
94%
#956
Xeon X5260
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#957
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
99%
#958
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
98%
#962
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
95%
#963
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
95%
#965
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
95%
#968
Xeon L3406
MSRP: $189|Avg: $30
91%
#969
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5260 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCeleron 847Xeon X5260
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 847 ($15), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($15 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCeleron 847Xeon X5260
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 847 and Xeon X5260

Intel

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Xeon X5260

The Xeon X5260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,278 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Celeron 847 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 847 scores 1,270 against the Xeon X5260's 1,278 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon X5260. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5260.

FeatureCeleron 847Xeon X5260
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.33 GHz+203%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
6 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,270
1,278
Geekbench 6 Single
196
Geekbench 6 Multi
354
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 847 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5260 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 847Xeon X5260
Socket
BGA1023
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 847) / not specified (Xeon X5260). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Xeon X5260 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron 847Xeon X5260
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget