PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 847 vs Celeron G550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 847 vs Celeron G550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 847

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (196 vs 379).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (354 vs 663).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 24.5 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).

Celeron G550

2012

Why buy it

✅+93.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $82 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 158.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G550 better than Celeron 847?

Yes. Celeron G550 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 87.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.4% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G550 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G550 is the stronger fit. You are getting 87.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G550 is the better buy right now. Celeron G550 comes in $82 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 158.7% better value on MSRP (24.5 vs 9.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G550 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 847 vs Celeron G550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

Celeron G550

The Celeron G550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 847 and Celeron G550 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G550 — a 81.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G550 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron 847 scores 1,270 against the Celeron G550's 1,275 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G550. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 196 vs 379, a 63.7% lead for the Celeron G550 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 354 vs 663 (60.8% advantage for the Celeron G550). Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 847	Celeron G550
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	2.6 GHz+136%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.6 GHz+136%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,270	1,275
Geekbench 6 Single	196	379+93%
Geekbench 6 Multi	354	663+87%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 847 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G550 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 847 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G550 — the Celeron 847 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G550 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67 (Celeron 847) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G550).

Feature	Celeron 847	Celeron G550
Socket	BGA1023	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron 847) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G550) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget, Celeron G550 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967; Celeron G550 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron 847	Celeron G550
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 847 was priced at $134, while the Celeron G550 came in at $52. On launch pricing ($134 vs $52), Celeron G550 was $82 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 847 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 24.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G550 — making the Celeron G550 the 88.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 847	Celeron G550
MSRP	$134	$52-61%
Performance per Dollar	9.5	24.5+158%
Release Date	2011	2012

Search Celeron 847 on Amazon

Search Celeron G550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.