Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron 847

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron 847 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo MV-40

1 / 1

1,274

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 847

2 / 2

1,270

0.0%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron 847 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron 847: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo MV-40

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.7 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2911.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 847 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron 847

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 512W, a 495W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Athlon Neo MV-40 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,270 vs 1,274).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Neo MV-40 better than Celeron 847?

Yes. Athlon Neo MV-40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon Neo MV-40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo MV-40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Neo MV-40 is the better buy right now. Athlon Neo MV-40 comes in $34 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 34.4% better value on MSRP (12.7 vs 9.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 847 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron 847 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo MV-40

The Athlon Neo MV-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Huron (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo MV-40 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron 847 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 847 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo MV-40 versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 — a 37% clock advantage for the Athlon Neo MV-40. The Athlon Neo MV-40 uses the Huron (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron 847 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo MV-40 scores 1,274 against the Celeron 847's 1,270 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon Neo MV-40.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Celeron 847
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz+45%	1.1 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Huron (2009)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,274	1,270
Geekbench 6 Single	—	196
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	354

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo MV-40 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 847 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon Neo MV-40 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 847 — the Celeron 847 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 847 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon Neo MV-40) vs 16 (Celeron 847) — the Celeron 847 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo MV-40) and HM65,HM67 (Celeron 847).

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Celeron 847
Socket	ASB1	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR3-1333+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Neo MV-40) / VT-x (Celeron 847). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon Neo MV-40 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Celeron 847
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Neo MV-40 was priced at $100, while the Celeron 847 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($100 vs $134), Athlon Neo MV-40 was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Neo MV-40 delivers 12.7 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Celeron 847 — making the Athlon Neo MV-40 the 29.4% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Celeron 847
MSRP	$100-25%	$134
Performance per Dollar	12.7+34%	9.5
Release Date	2009	2011

Search Athlon Neo MV-40 on Amazon

Search Celeron 847 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.