Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Pentium SU2700

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Pentium SU2700 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo MV-40

1 / 1

1,274

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium SU2700

1 / 1

1,268

0.0%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo MV-40

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,268 vs 1,274).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Neo MV-40 better than Pentium SU2700?

Yes. Athlon Neo MV-40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon Neo MV-40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo MV-40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Neo MV-40 is the better buy right now. Athlon Neo MV-40 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $100 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.5% better value on MSRP (12.7 vs 12.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Neo MV-40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo MV-40

The Athlon Neo MV-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Huron (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon Neo MV-40 and Pentium SU2700 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo MV-40 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Athlon Neo MV-40. The Athlon Neo MV-40 uses the Huron (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo MV-40 scores 1,274 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon Neo MV-40.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Huron (2009)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,274	1,268

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo MV-40 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Pentium SU2700
Socket	ASB1	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Neo MV-40 was priced at $100, while the Pentium SU2700 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($100 vs $100), Pentium SU2700 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Neo MV-40 delivers 12.7 pts/$ vs 12.7 pts/$ for the Pentium SU2700 — making the Athlon Neo MV-40 the 0.5% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Pentium SU2700
MSRP	$100	$100
Performance per Dollar	12.7	12.7
Release Date	2009	2009

Search Athlon Neo MV-40 on Amazon

Search Pentium SU2700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.