A4-4020 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

A4-4020 vs Athlon Neo MV-40 Performance Spectrum

A4-4020

2 / 2

1,269

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon Neo MV-40

1 / 1

1,274

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4020 vs Athlon Neo MV-40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4020 vs Athlon Neo MV-40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4020

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7480D, while Athlon Neo MV-40 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon Neo MV-40.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,269 vs 1,274).

Athlon Neo MV-40

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while A4-4020 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-4020 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-4020.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-4020 better than Athlon Neo MV-40?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-4020 is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo MV-40 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo MV-40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-4020 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-4020 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Neo MV-40 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on ASB1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-4020 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-4020 vs Athlon Neo MV-40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4020

The A4-4020 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,269 points. Launch price was $50.

Athlon Neo MV-40

The Athlon Neo MV-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Huron (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-4020 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon Neo MV-40 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A4-4020 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A4-4020 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo MV-40 — a 72% clock advantage for the A4-4020. The A4-4020 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon Neo MV-40 uses Huron (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4020 scores 1,269 against the Athlon Neo MV-40's 1,274 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon Neo MV-40.

Feature	A4-4020	Athlon Neo MV-40
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+112%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Huron (2009)
PassMark	1,269	1,274
Geekbench 6 Single	341	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4020 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon Neo MV-40 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-4020 versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon Neo MV-40 — the A4-4020 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-4020 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-4020) vs 0 (Athlon Neo MV-40) — the A4-4020 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-4020) and AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo MV-40).

Feature	A4-4020	Athlon Neo MV-40
Socket	FM2	ASB1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+100%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-4020) / not specified (Athlon Neo MV-40). The A4-4020 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7480D), while the Athlon Neo MV-40 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4020 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-4020 rivals Pentium G3220.