A4-4020 vs Core i3-2350M

A4-4020 vs Core i3-2350M Performance Spectrum

A4-4020

2 / 2

1,269

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2350M

2 / 4

1,276

+0.6%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4020 vs Core i3-2350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4020 vs Core i3-2350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4020

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-2350M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (341 vs 390).
❌Lower PassMark (1,269 vs 1,276).

Core i3-2350M

2011

Why buy it

✅+14.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-4020.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2350M better than A4-4020?

Yes. Core i3-2350M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2350M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2350M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2350M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2350M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-4020 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-4020 vs Core i3-2350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4020

The A4-4020 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,269 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i3-2350M

The Core i3-2350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,276 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-4020 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2350M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A4-4020 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-2350M — a 38.6% clock advantage for the A4-4020 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The A4-4020 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2350M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4020 scores 1,269 against the Core i3-2350M's 1,276 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-2350M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 341 vs 390, a 13.4% lead for the Core i3-2350M that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4-4020	Core i3-2350M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+48%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+39%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,269	1,276
Geekbench 6 Single	341	390+14%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	806

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4020 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2350M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-4020) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i3-2350M).

Feature	A4-4020	Core i3-2350M
Socket	FM2	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-4020) vs VT-x (Core i3-2350M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7480D (A4-4020) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2350M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4020 targets Budget Desktop, Core i3-2350M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-4020 rivals Pentium G3220.