A4-4020 vs Core i3-4012Y

AMD

A4-4020

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-4012Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

A4-4020 vs Core i3-4012Y Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4020 vs Core i3-4012Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4020 vs Core i3-4012Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4020

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4012Y.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (341 vs 485).
  • Lower PassMark (1,269 vs 1,278).

Core i3-4012Y

2013

Why buy it

  • +42.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

  • 687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-4020.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4012Y better than A4-4020?
Yes. Core i3-4012Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4012Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4012Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-4012Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4012Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-4020 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-4020 vs Core i3-4012Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A4-4020

The A4-4020 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,269 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core i3-4012Y

The Core i3-4012Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,278 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A4-4020 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4012Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A4-4020 versus 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-4012Y — a 77.6% clock advantage for the A4-4020 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A4-4020 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4012Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4020 scores 1,269 against the Core i3-4012Y's 1,278 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-4012Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 341 vs 485, a 34.9% lead for the Core i3-4012Y that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA4-4020Core i3-4012Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+127%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+113%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)+100%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,269
1,278
Geekbench 6 Single
341
485+42%
Geekbench 6 Multi
988
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4020 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4012Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-4020 versus DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4012Y — the Core i3-4012Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-4020) vs 12 (Core i3-4012Y) — the A4-4020 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-4020) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i3-4012Y).

FeatureA4-4020Core i3-4012Y
Socket
FM2
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-4020) vs VT-x / EPT (Core i3-4012Y). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 7480D (A4-4020) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4012Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4020 targets Budget Desktop, Core i3-4012Y targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A4-4020 rivals Pentium G3220.

FeatureA4-4020Core i3-4012Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7480D
Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x / EPT
Target Use
Budget Desktop
Low Power