A4-4020 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500

A4-4020 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Performance Spectrum

A4-4020

2 / 2

1,269

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

2 / 2

1,275

+0.5%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4020 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4020 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4020

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7480D, while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron Dual-Core T3500.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,269 vs 1,275).
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A4-4020 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-4020 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-4020.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T3500 better than A4-4020?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-4020 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3500 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core T3500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that A4-4020 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-4020 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-4020 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4020

The A4-4020 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,269 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-4020 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A4-4020 versus 2.1 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 — a 47.3% clock advantage for the A4-4020. The A4-4020 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4020 scores 1,269 against the Celeron Dual-Core T3500's 1,275 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T3500.

Feature	A4-4020	Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+62%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,269	1,275
Geekbench 6 Single	341	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4020 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-4020 versus 800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 — the A4-4020 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-4020 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-4020) vs 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500) — the A4-4020 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-4020) and GL40,GM45,GM47 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500).

Feature	A4-4020	Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Socket	FM2	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+67%	800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-4020) vs false (Celeron Dual-Core T3500). The A4-4020 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7480D), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4020 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron Dual-Core T3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-4020 rivals Pentium G3220; Celeron Dual-Core T3500 rivals Pentium T4400.