Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron N3060

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron N3060 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo MV-40

1 / 1

1,274

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N3060

2 / 2

1,267

0.0%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron N3060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron N3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo MV-40

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3060 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron N3060

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Athlon Neo MV-40 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,267 vs 1,274).
❌
7% HIGHER MSRP
$107 MSRPvs$100 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3060 better than Athlon Neo MV-40?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N3060 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo MV-40 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo MV-40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3060 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N3060 comes in 7.0% more expensive on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Neo MV-40 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 7.6% better value on paper (12.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on ASB1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3060 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron N3060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo MV-40

The Athlon Neo MV-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Huron (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron N3060

The Celeron N3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,267 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo MV-40 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron N3060 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N3060 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo MV-40 versus 2.48 GHz on the Celeron N3060 — a 43.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N3060. The Athlon Neo MV-40 uses the Huron (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron N3060 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo MV-40 scores 1,274 against the Celeron N3060's 1,267 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon Neo MV-40.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Celeron N3060
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.48 GHz+55%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	Huron (2009)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,274	1,267

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo MV-40 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N3060 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon Neo MV-40 versus 1600 on the Celeron N3060 — the Celeron N3060 supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron N3060 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon Neo MV-40) vs 4 (Celeron N3060) — the Celeron N3060 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo MV-40) and FCBGA1170 (Celeron N3060).

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Celeron N3060
Socket	ASB1	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	1600+140%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Neo MV-40) / true (Celeron N3060). The Celeron N3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Athlon Neo MV-40 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3060 rivals AMD E2-9010.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Celeron N3060
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics 400
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Neo MV-40 was priced at $100, while the Celeron N3060 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($100 vs $107), Athlon Neo MV-40 was $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Neo MV-40 delivers 12.7 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Celeron N3060 — making the Athlon Neo MV-40 the 7.3% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Celeron N3060
MSRP	$100-7%	$107
Performance per Dollar	12.7+8%	11.8
Release Date	2009	2016

Search Athlon Neo MV-40 on Amazon

Search Celeron N3060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.