Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Athlon X2 QL-60

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Athlon X2 QL-60 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo MV-40

1 / 1

1,274

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X2 QL-60

2 / 2

1,273

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Athlon X2 QL-60 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Athlon X2 QL-60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo MV-40

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Athlon X2 QL-60 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Athlon X2 QL-60

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,273 vs 1,274).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Neo MV-40 better than Athlon X2 QL-60?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X2 QL-60 is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo MV-40 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo MV-40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Neo MV-40 is the better buy right now. Athlon Neo MV-40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon X2 QL-60 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Neo MV-40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Athlon X2 QL-60 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo MV-40

The Athlon Neo MV-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Huron (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon X2 QL-60

The Athlon X2 QL-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,273 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo MV-40 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Athlon X2 QL-60 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon X2 QL-60 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo MV-40 versus 1.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-60 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 QL-60. The Athlon Neo MV-40 uses the Huron (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon X2 QL-60 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo MV-40 scores 1,274 against the Athlon X2 QL-60's 1,273 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon Neo MV-40.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Athlon X2 QL-60
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.9 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Huron (2009)	Lion (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,274	1,273

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo MV-40 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 QL-60 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. The Athlon X2 QL-60 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo MV-40) and AMD S1 (Athlon X2 QL-60).