Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Pentium Dual Core T4400

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Pentium Dual Core T4400 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo MV-40

1 / 1

1,274

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium Dual Core T4400

2 / 2

1,284

+0.8%

Atom D2550

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Pentium Dual Core T4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Pentium Dual Core T4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo MV-40

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,274 vs 1,284).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Pentium Dual Core T4400

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
7% HIGHER MSRP
$107 MSRPvs$100 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual Core T4400 better than Athlon Neo MV-40?

Yes. Pentium Dual Core T4400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium Dual Core T4400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T4400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual Core T4400 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium Dual Core T4400 comes in 7.0% more expensive on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Neo MV-40 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 6.2% better value on paper (12.7 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on ASB1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium Dual Core T4400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Pentium Dual Core T4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo MV-40

The Athlon Neo MV-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Huron (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium Dual Core T4400

The Pentium Dual Core T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,284 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo MV-40 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium Dual Core T4400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium Dual Core T4400 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo MV-40 versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4400 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual Core T4400. The Athlon Neo MV-40 uses the Huron (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4400 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo MV-40 scores 1,274 against the Pentium Dual Core T4400's 1,284 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T4400.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Pentium Dual Core T4400
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.2 GHz+38%
Base Clock	—	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Huron (2009)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,274	1,284

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo MV-40 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T4400 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Pentium Dual Core T4400
Socket	ASB1	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Neo MV-40 was priced at $100, while the Pentium Dual Core T4400 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($100 vs $107), Athlon Neo MV-40 was $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Neo MV-40 delivers 12.7 pts/$ vs 12.0 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T4400 — making the Athlon Neo MV-40 the 6% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Neo MV-40	Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP	$100-7%	$107
Performance per Dollar	12.7+6%	12.0
Release Date	2009	2009

Search Athlon Neo MV-40 on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual Core T4400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.