PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 847 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 847 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 847

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,270 vs 1,275).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌1600% higher power demand at 17W vs 1W.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 68.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 17W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 847 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T3500 better than Celeron 847?

Yes. Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core T3500 comes in $54 cheaper on MSRP at $80 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 68.2% better value on MSRP (15.9 vs 9.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 847 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 847 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 847 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 versus 2.1 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 — a 62.5% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T3500. The Celeron 847 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 847 scores 1,270 against the Celeron Dual-Core T3500's 1,275 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T3500.

Feature	Celeron 847	Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	2.1 GHz+91%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,270	1,275
Geekbench 6 Single	196	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	354	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 847 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 847 versus 800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 — the Celeron 847 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 847 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 847) vs 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500) — the Celeron 847 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67 (Celeron 847) and GL40,GM45,GM47 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500).

Feature	Celeron 847	Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Socket	BGA1023	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+67%	800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 847) vs false (Celeron Dual-Core T3500). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget, Celeron Dual-Core T3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967; Celeron Dual-Core T3500 rivals Pentium T4400.

Feature	Celeron 847	Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	false
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 847 was priced at $134, while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($134 vs $80), Celeron Dual-Core T3500 was $54 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 847 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 the 50.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 847	Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP	$134	$80-40%
Performance per Dollar	9.5	15.9+67%
Release Date	2011	2010

Search Celeron 847 on Amazon

Search Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.