Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Core 2 Duo U7600
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Core 2 Duo U7600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is positioned at rank 1101 and the Core 2 Duo U7600 is on rank 1206, so the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Core 2 Duo U7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($110) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Manchester (2005−2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Core 2 Duo U7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2114%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($110) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Core 2 Duo U7600
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,255 points. Launch price was $309.
Core 2 Duo U7600
The Core 2 Duo U7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,263 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Core 2 Duo U7600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ versus 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7600 — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 4200+. The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ uses the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Core 2 Duo U7600 uses Merom-2048 (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ scores 1,255 against the Core 2 Duo U7600's 1,263 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo U7600. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Core 2 Duo U7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+83% | 1.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | Manchester (2005−2006) | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,255 | 1,263 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo U7600 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Core 2 Duo U7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ launched at $581 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo U7600 debuted at $250. At current prices ($110 vs $5), the Core 2 Duo U7600 is $105 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ delivers 11.4 pts/$ vs 252.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo U7600 — making the Core 2 Duo U7600 the 182.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Core 2 Duo U7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $581 | $250-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110 | $5-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.4 | 252.6+2116% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Core 2 Duo U7600
