A4-1250 vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+
A4-1250
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-1250 is positioned at rank 1023 and the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is on rank 1101, so the A4-1250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A4-1250
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A4-1250 | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($110) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Manchester (2005−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A4-1250 | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+268%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($110) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A4-1250 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+
A4-1250
The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,255 points. Launch price was $309.
Processing Power
Both the A4-1250 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ — a 75% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 4200+. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ uses Manchester (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Athlon 64 X2 4200+'s 1,255 — a 0.2% lead for the A4-1250. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+120% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB |
| Process | 32 nm-64% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Temash (2013) | Manchester (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 1,258 | 1,255 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 111 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 188 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L 1333 MHz on the A4-1250 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ — the A4-1250 supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1250) vs 2 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1250) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+) — the A4-1250 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3 (A4-1250) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+).
| Feature | A4-1250 | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | 939 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L 1333 MHz+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A4-1250) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 4200+). The A4-1250 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8210 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | Tablet | — |
Value Analysis
The A4-1250 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ debuted at $581. At current prices ($30 vs $110), the A4-1250 is $80 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A4-1250 delivers 41.9 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ — making the A4-1250 the 114.4% better value option.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Athlon 64 X2 4200+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-83% | $581 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-73% | $110 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.9+268% | 11.4 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-1250 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+
