A4-1250 vs Celeron 847
A4-1250
Celeron 847
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-1250 is positioned at rank 1023 and the Celeron 847 is on rank 1093, so the A4-1250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A4-1250
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 847
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A4-1250 | Celeron 847 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A4-1250 | Celeron 847 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+102%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A4-1250 and Celeron 847
A4-1250
The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.
Celeron 847
The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
Both the A4-1250 and Celeron 847 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Celeron 847. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 847 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Celeron 847's 1,270 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron 847. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 111 vs 196, a 55.4% lead for the Celeron 847 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 188 vs 354 (61.3% advantage for the Celeron 847). L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1250 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron 847 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 1.1 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Temash (2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,258 | 1,270 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 111 | 196+77% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 188 | 354+88% |
Memory & Platform
The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 847 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L 1333 MHz on the A4-1250 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 847 — the A4-1250 supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 847 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1250) vs 2 (Celeron 847). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1250) vs 16 (Celeron 847) — the Celeron 847 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3 (A4-1250) and HM65,HM67 (Celeron 847).
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron 847 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L 1333 MHz | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A4-1250) vs VT-x (Celeron 847). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8210 (A4-1250) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron 847) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet, Celeron 847 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740; Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron 847 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8210 | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | Tablet | Budget |
Value Analysis
The A4-1250 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron 847 debuted at $134. At current prices ($30 vs $15), the Celeron 847 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A4-1250 delivers 41.9 pts/$ vs 84.7 pts/$ for the Celeron 847 — making the Celeron 847 the 67.5% better value option.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron 847 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-25% | $134 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $15-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.9 | 84.7+102% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-1250 and Celeron 847
