
A4-1250 vs Core i5-13600K

A4-1250

Core i5-13600K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The A4-1250 is positioned at rank #1023 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A4-1250
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A4-1250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A4-1250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+181%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A4-1250 and Core i5-13600K

A4-1250
The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The A4-1250 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 134.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 187.1% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1250 vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 14 / 20+600% |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 5.1 GHz+410% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 24 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Temash (2013) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 1,258 | 37,655+2893% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 111 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 188 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13600K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L 1333 MHz on the A4-1250 versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K — the A4-1250 supports 199.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1250) vs 2 (Core i5-13600K). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1250) vs 20 (Core i5-13600K) — the Core i5-13600K offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3 (A4-1250) and Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K).
| Feature | A4-1250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L 1333 MHz | DDR5-5600+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 192 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 20+150% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A4-1250) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8210 (A4-1250) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet, Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8210 | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Tablet | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The A4-1250 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core i5-13600K debuted at $329. At current prices ($30 vs $319), the A4-1250 is $289 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A4-1250 delivers 41.9 pts/$ vs 118.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-13600K — making the Core i5-13600K the 95.1% better value option.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-70% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-91% | $319 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.9 | 118.0+182% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















