A4-1250
Celeron N3060
A4-1250 vs Celeron N3060 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-1250 vs Celeron N3060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-1250 vs Celeron N3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-1250
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,258 vs 1,267).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 8W vs 6W.
Celeron N3060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 8W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌7% HIGHER MSRP$107 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron N3060 better than A4-1250?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-1250 vs Celeron N3060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A4-1250
The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.
Celeron N3060
The Celeron N3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,267 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
Both the A4-1250 and Celeron N3060 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 2.48 GHz on the Celeron N3060 — a 85.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N3060. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N3060 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Celeron N3060's 1,267 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N3060. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron N3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 2.48 GHz+148% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Temash (2013) | Braswell (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,258 | 1,267 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 111 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 188 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3060 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L 1333 MHz on the A4-1250 versus 1600 on the Celeron N3060 — the Celeron N3060 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1250) vs 2 (Celeron N3060). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1250) vs 4 (Celeron N3060) — the A4-1250 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3 (A4-1250) and FCBGA1170 (Celeron N3060).
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron N3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L 1333 MHz | 1600+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8+100% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8210 (A4-1250) and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron N3060) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740; Celeron N3060 rivals AMD E2-9010.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron N3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8210 | Intel HD Graphics 400 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | Tablet | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A4-1250 was priced at $100, while the Celeron N3060 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($100 vs $107), A4-1250 was $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A4-1250 delivers 12.6 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Celeron N3060 — making the A4-1250 the 6.1% better value option.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron N3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-7% | $107 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6+7% | 11.8 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-1250 and Celeron N3060
