A4-1250 vs Pentium SU2700

A4-1250 vs Pentium SU2700 Performance Spectrum

A4-1250

2 / 2

1,258

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium SU2700

1 / 1

1,268

+0.8%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-1250 vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-1250 vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-1250

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 10W, a 2W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8210, while Pentium SU2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,258 vs 1,268).

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌25% higher power demand at 10W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-1250 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium SU2700 better than A4-1250?

Yes. Pentium SU2700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium SU2700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium SU2700 is the better buy right now. Pentium SU2700 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $100 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.8% better value on MSRP (12.7 vs 12.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-1250 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-1250 vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-1250

The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-1250 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A4-1250 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Pentium SU2700. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium SU2700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-1250	Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1 GHz	1.3 GHz+30%
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Temash (2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,258	1,268
Geekbench 6 Single	111	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	188	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-1250	Pentium SU2700
Socket	FT3	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L 1333 MHz	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A4-1250) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). The A4-1250 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Pentium SU2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740.

Feature	A4-1250	Pentium SU2700
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 8210	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—
Target Use	Tablet	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A4-1250 was priced at $100, while the Pentium SU2700 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($100 vs $100), Pentium SU2700 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A4-1250 delivers 12.6 pts/$ vs 12.7 pts/$ for the Pentium SU2700 — making the Pentium SU2700 the 0.8% better value option.

Feature	A4-1250	Pentium SU2700
MSRP	$100	$100
Performance per Dollar	12.6	12.7
Release Date	2013	2009

Search A4-1250 on Amazon

Search Pentium SU2700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.