A4-1250
VS
Pentium J2900

A4-1250 vs Pentium J2900

AMD

A4-1250

2 Cores2 Thrd8 WWMax: 1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium J2900

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-1250 is positioned at rank 1023 and the Pentium J2900 is on rank 1013, so the Pentium J2900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-1250

#1011
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2332%
#1012
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2298%
#1013
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2110%
#1014
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2100%
#1015
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2081%
#1017
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2010%
#1018
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1927%
#1019
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1924%
#1020
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1872%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
99%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
97%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
95%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
94%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium J2900

#1001
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2199%
#1002
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2167%
#1003
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1990%
#1004
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1981%
#1005
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1962%
#1007
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1895%
#1008
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1817%
#1009
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1814%
#1010
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1765%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
100%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
99%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
99%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
98%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
98%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
97%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
96%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
95%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
94%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
93%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium J2900 leads in gaming performance. However, the A4-1250 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4-1250Pentium J2900
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium J2900 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 33% cheaper ($20 vs $30) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightA4-1250Pentium J2900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+50%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-1250 and Pentium J2900

AMD

A4-1250

The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium J2900

The Pentium J2900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,254 points. Launch price was $94.

Processing Power

The A4-1250 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J2900 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2900 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 2.66 GHz on the Pentium J2900 — a 90.7% clock advantage for the Pentium J2900. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium J2900 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Pentium J2900's 1,254 — a 0.3% lead for the A4-1250. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1250 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium J2900.

FeatureA4-1250Pentium J2900
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1 GHz
2.66 GHz+166%
Base Clock
2.41 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Temash (2013)
Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark
1,258
1,254
Geekbench 6 Single
111
Geekbench 6 Multi
188
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium J2900 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA4-1250Pentium J2900
Socket
FT3
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L 1333 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A4-1250) / not specified (Pentium J2900). The A4-1250 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Pentium J2900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740.

FeatureA4-1250Pentium J2900
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8210
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Tablet
💰

Value Analysis

The A4-1250 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Pentium J2900 debuted at $94. At current prices ($30 vs $20), the Pentium J2900 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A4-1250 delivers 41.9 pts/$ vs 62.7 pts/$ for the Pentium J2900 — making the Pentium J2900 the 39.7% better value option.

FeatureA4-1250Pentium J2900
MSRP
$100
$94-6%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$20-33%
Performance per Dollar
41.9
62.7+50%
Release Date
2013
2013