A4-1250 vs Pentium G6950

AMD

A4-1250

2 Cores2 Thrd8 WWMax: 1 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G6950

2 Cores2 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

A4-1250 vs Pentium G6950 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-1250 vs Pentium G6950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-1250 vs Pentium G6950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-1250

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 8W instead of 73W, a 65W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8210, while Pentium G6950 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).

Pentium G6950

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $13 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 14.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,252 vs 1,258).
  • 812.5% higher power demand at 73W vs 8W.
  • No integrated graphics, while A4-1250 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-1250 better than Pentium G6950?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G6950 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A4-1250 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-1250 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A4-1250 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-1250 comes in 14.9% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $87 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Pentium G6950 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 14.4% better value on paper (14.4 vs 12.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-1250 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-1250 vs Pentium G6950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A4-1250

The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium G6950

The Pentium G6950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,252 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

Both the A4-1250 and Pentium G6950 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G6950 — a 94.7% clock advantage for the Pentium G6950. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G6950 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Pentium G6950's 1,252 — a 0.5% lead for the A4-1250. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1250 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G6950.

FeatureA4-1250Pentium G6950
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1 GHz
2.8 GHz+180%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Temash (2013)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,258
1,252
Geekbench 6 Single
111
Geekbench 6 Multi
188
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G6950 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA4-1250Pentium G6950
Socket
FT3
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L 1333 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A4-1250) / not specified (Pentium G6950). The A4-1250 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Pentium G6950 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740.

FeatureA4-1250Pentium G6950
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8210
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Tablet
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A4-1250 was priced at $100, while the Pentium G6950 came in at $87. On launch pricing ($100 vs $87), Pentium G6950 was $13 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A4-1250 delivers 12.6 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the Pentium G6950 — making the Pentium G6950 the 13.4% better value option.

FeatureA4-1250Pentium G6950
MSRP
$100
$87-13%
Performance per Dollar
12.6
14.4+14%
Release Date
2013
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.