
Core 2 Extreme X9100 vs Celeron 6305

Core 2 Extreme X9100

Celeron 6305
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Extreme X9100 is positioned at rank 277 and the Celeron 6305 is on rank 897, so the Core 2 Extreme X9100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme X9100
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 6305
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Extreme X9100 | Celeron 6305 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($851) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn XE (2008) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Extreme X9100 | Celeron 6305 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+971%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($851) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Celeron 6305

Core 2 Extreme X9100
The Core 2 Extreme X9100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn XE (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $851.

Celeron 6305
The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Celeron 6305 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X9100 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 6305 — a 185% clock advantage for the Celeron 6305. The Core 2 Extreme X9100 uses the Penryn XE (2008) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 6305 uses Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core 2 Extreme X9100 scores 2,063 against the Celeron 6305's 2,077 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 6305. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Extreme X9100 vs 4 MB on the Celeron 6305.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme X9100 | Celeron 6305 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | 1.8 GHz+2471% |
| Base Clock | 3.06 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+140% | 2.5 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-78% |
| Architecture | Penryn XE (2008) | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 2,063 | 2,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 744 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,236 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Extreme X9100 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 6305 uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme X9100 | Celeron 6305 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FCBGA1449 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Extreme X9100) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 6305). The Celeron 6305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen), while the Core 2 Extreme X9100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 6305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme X9100 | Celeron 6305 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics for 11th Gen |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Extreme X9100 launched at $851 MSRP, while the Celeron 6305 debuted at $107.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme X9100 | Celeron 6305 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $851 | $107-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $80 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











