Core 2 Quad Q8200
VS
Core 2 Duo T9550

Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Core 2 Duo T9550

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8200

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T9550

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q8200 is positioned at rank 1028 and the Core 2 Duo T9550 is on rank 342, so the Core 2 Duo T9550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q8200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
38626%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
36498%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
26501%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7984%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6324%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5532%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3169%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3127%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2847%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2847%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2815%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2739%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2701%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2690%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2666%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
95%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
100%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
99%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
99%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
99%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
96%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
96%
#1035
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
94%
#1036
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
94%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
94%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
94%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
93%
#1041
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
93%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9550

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
98%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
96%
#330
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
488%
#331
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
481%
#332
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
441%
#333
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
439%
#334
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
435%
#336
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
420%
#337
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
403%
#338
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
402%
#339
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
392%
#342
Core 2 Duo T9550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo T9550 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Quad Q8200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo T9550
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($36)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo T9550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($36)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Duo T9550

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8200

The Core 2 Quad Q8200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,807 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9550

The Core 2 Duo T9550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,804 points. Launch price was $316.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q8200 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T9550 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8200 versus 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9550 — a 13.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9550 (base: 2.33 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q8200 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9550 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q8200 scores 1,807 against the Core 2 Duo T9550's 1,804 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9550.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo T9550
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.33 GHz
2.66 GHz+14%
Base Clock
2.33 GHz
2.66 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
0 kB
6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB+50%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,807
1,804
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q8200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo T9550 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo T9550
Socket
LGA775
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q8200) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T9550). Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q8200 targets Desktop.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo T9550
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop