Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Core 2 Quad Q9100
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Quad Q9100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q8200 is positioned at rank 1028 and the Core 2 Quad Q9100 is on rank 69, so the Core 2 Quad Q9100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q8200
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Core 2 Quad Q9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($36) | ✅ More affordable ($14) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Core 2 Quad Q9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+157%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($36) | ✅ More affordable ($14) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q9100
Core 2 Quad Q8200
The Core 2 Quad Q8200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,807 points. Launch price was $249.
Core 2 Quad Q9100
The Core 2 Quad Q9100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,806 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8200 versus 2.26 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9100 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q8200 (base: 2.33 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q8200 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q9100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q8200 scores 1,807 against the Core 2 Quad Q9100's 1,806 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Core 2 Quad Q9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.33 GHz+3% | 2.26 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.33 GHz+3% | 2.26 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+50% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,807 | 1,806 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q8200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Quad Q9100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Quad Q8200) vs 0 (Core 2 Quad Q9100) — the Core 2 Quad Q8200 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Core 2 Quad Q9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q8200 targets Desktop, Core 2 Quad Q9100 targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Core 2 Quad Q9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Desktop | Mobile |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Quad Q8200 launched at $224 MSRP, while the Core 2 Quad Q9100 debuted at $14. At current prices ($36 vs $14), the Core 2 Quad Q9100 is $22 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q8200 delivers 50.2 pts/$ vs 129.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q9100 — making the Core 2 Quad Q9100 the 88% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Core 2 Quad Q9100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224 | $14-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $36 | $14-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.2 | 129.0+157% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q9100
