Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs Core i3-3240T
Core 2 Quad Q8400
Core i3-3240T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q8400 is positioned at rank 975 and the Core i3-3240T is on rank 851, so the Core i3-3240T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q8400
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3240T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q8400 | Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($128) | ✅ More affordable ($8) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q8400 | Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1502%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($128) | ✅ More affordable ($8) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i3-3240T
Core 2 Quad Q8400
The Core 2 Quad Q8400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,076 points. Launch price was $249.
Core i3-3240T
The Core i3-3240T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,078 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Quad Q8400 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3240T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8400 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8400 versus 3 GHz on the Core i3-3240T — a 127% clock advantage for the Core i3-3240T (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q8400 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-3240T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q8400 scores 2,076 against the Core i3-3240T's 2,078 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-3240T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3240T.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8400 | Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 0.67 GHz | 3 GHz+348% |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz | 2.9 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,076 | 2,078 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 852 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 369 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,155 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q8400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-3240T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8400 | Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3 1333 MHz | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core 2 Quad Q8400) / not specified (Core i3-3240T). Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q8400 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8400 | Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Quad Q8400 launched at $183 MSRP, while the Core i3-3240T debuted at $117. At current prices ($128 vs $8), the Core i3-3240T is $120 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q8400 delivers 16.2 pts/$ vs 259.8 pts/$ for the Core i3-3240T — making the Core i3-3240T the 176.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8400 | Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $183 | $117-36% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $128 | $8-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.2 | 259.8+1504% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Core i3-3240T
