Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Core i5-3339Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Core i5-3339Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Core i5-3339Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q9000

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $348 MSRP, while Core i5-3339Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3339Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-3339Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core 2 Quad Q9000 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,589 vs 1,597).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Quad Q9000 better than Core i5-3339Y?

Yes. Core 2 Quad Q9000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Quad Q9000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Quad Q9000 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Quad Q9000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $348 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3339Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Core i5-3339Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q9000

The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,597 points. Launch price was $348.

Core i5-3339Y

The Core i5-3339Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,589 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q9000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3339Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9000 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9000 versus 2 GHz on the Core i5-3339Y — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9000 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-3339Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9000 scores 1,597 against the Core i5-3339Y's 1,589 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q9000. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3339Y.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q9000	Core i5-3339Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+33%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache+100%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	6 MB	256K (per core)+4167%
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,597	1,589
Geekbench 6 Single	—	368
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	707

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q9000 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-3339Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q9000	Core i5-3339Y
Socket	PGA478	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	—	1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9000) / true (Core i5-3339Y). The Core i5-3339Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Quad Q9000 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-3339Y rivals AMD A8-4555M.