
Core 2 Quad Q9000

Phenom II X3 720
Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Phenom II X3 720 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Phenom II X3 720 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Phenom II X3 720: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 95W, a 89W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,597 vs 1,600).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($348 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X3 720.
Phenom II X3 720
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $348 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 168.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($130 MSRP vs $348 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Core 2 Quad Q9000.
Trade-offs
- ❌1483.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 6W.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X3 720 better than Core 2 Quad Q9000?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Phenom II X3 720 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q9000
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,597 points. Launch price was $348.

Phenom II X3 720
The Phenom II X3 720 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X3 720 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9000 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9000 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X3 720 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 720 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9000 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X3 720 uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9000 scores 1,597 against the Phenom II X3 720's 1,600 — a 0.2% lead for the Phenom II X3 720. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 720.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+33% | 3 / 3 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+40% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Heka (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,597 | 1,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 380 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 980 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom II X3 720 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9000) / AMD-V (Phenom II X3 720). Primary use case: Phenom II X3 720 targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Quad Q9000 was priced at $348, while the Phenom II X3 720 came in at $130. On launch pricing ($348 vs $130), Phenom II X3 720 was $218 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9000 delivers 4.6 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Phenom II X3 720 — making the Phenom II X3 720 the 91.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $348 | $130-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.6 | 12.3+167% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















