Core 2 Quad Q9100 vs Pentium G3250T

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9100

4 Cores4 Thrd12 WWMax: 2.26 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Pentium G3250T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Quad Q9100 vs Pentium G3250T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q9100 vs Pentium G3250T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q9100 vs Pentium G3250T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q9100

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($14 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
  • Delivers 354.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.0 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($14 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
  • Draws 12W instead of 35W, a 23W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,806 vs 1,818).

Pentium G3250T

2014

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.4 vs 129.0 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $14 MSRP).
    • 191.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 12W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium G3250T better than Core 2 Quad Q9100?
    Yes. Pentium G3250T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium G3250T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3250T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium G3250T is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium G3250T comes in 357.1% more expensive on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $14 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Quad Q9100 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 354.1% better value on paper (129.0 vs 28.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium G3250T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core 2 Quad Q9100 vs Pentium G3250T Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core 2 Quad Q9100

    The Core 2 Quad Q9100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,806 points. Launch price was $249.

    Intel

    Pentium G3250T

    The Pentium G3250T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,818 points. Launch price was $46.

    Processing Power

    The Core 2 Quad Q9100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G3250T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.26 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9100 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G3250T — a 21.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G3250T (base: 2.26 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9100 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G3250T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9100 scores 1,806 against the Pentium G3250T's 1,818 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G3250T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q9100 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3250T.

    FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9100Pentium G3250T
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.26 GHz
    2.8 GHz+24%
    Base Clock
    2.26 GHz
    2.8 GHz+24%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    3 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    6 MB (total)+2300%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    45 nm
    22 nm-51%
    Architecture
    Penryn (2008−2011)
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    PassMark
    1,806
    1,818
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core 2 Quad Q9100 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G3250T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9100Pentium G3250T
    Socket
    PGA478
    LGA1150
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 3.0+173%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1066
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q9100) / not specified (Pentium G3250T). Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q9100 targets Mobile.

    FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9100Pentium G3250T
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Mobile
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Core 2 Quad Q9100 was priced at $14, while the Pentium G3250T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($14 vs $64), Core 2 Quad Q9100 was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9100 delivers 129.0 pts/$ vs 28.4 pts/$ for the Pentium G3250T — making the Core 2 Quad Q9100 the 127.8% better value option.

    FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9100Pentium G3250T
    MSRP
    $14-78%
    $64
    Performance per Dollar
    129.0+354%
    28.4
    Release Date
    2008
    2014

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.