Core 2 Quad Q9300
VS
A4-4300M

Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs A4-4300M

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9300

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008
VS
AMD

A4-4300M

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q9300 is positioned at rank 1039 and the A4-4300M is on rank 647, so the A4-4300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41232%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
38960%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28288%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8522%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6750%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5905%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3382%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3338%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3039%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3039%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3005%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2924%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2883%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2872%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2846%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
100%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
100%
#1041
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
100%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
97%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
94%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
94%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
93%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
92%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
91%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
90%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
90%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
90%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-4300M

#635
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
882%
#636
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
869%
#637
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
797%
#638
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
794%
#639
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
787%
#641
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
760%
#642
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
728%
#643
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
727%
#644
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
708%
#647
A4-4300M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-4300M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Quad Q9300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Quad Q9300A4-4300M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($27)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Quad Q9300A4-4300M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($27)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q9300 and A4-4300M

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9300

The Core 2 Quad Q9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,011 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

A4-4300M

The A4-4300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 1,997 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q9300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the A4-4300M offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9300 versus 3 GHz on the A4-4300M — a 18.2% clock advantage for the A4-4300M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9300 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the A4-4300M uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9300 scores 2,011 against the A4-4300M's 1,997 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q9300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9300A4-4300M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
3 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+500%
1 MB (total)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,011
1,997
Geekbench 6 Single
282
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q9300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A4-4300M uses FS1r2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9300A4-4300M
Socket
LGA775
FS1r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9300) / AMD-V (A4-4300M). The A4-4300M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7420G), while the Core 2 Quad Q9300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4300M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-4300M rivals Pentium B980.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9300A4-4300M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7420G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop