
Core 2 Quad Q9300

Core i5-2430M
Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs Core i5-2430M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs Core i5-2430M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs Core i5-2430M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Quad Q9300
2008Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,011 vs 2,015).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2430M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-2430M
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $41 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core 2 Quad Q9300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2430M better than Core 2 Quad Q9300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs Core i5-2430M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q9300
The Core 2 Quad Q9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,011 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i5-2430M
The Core i5-2430M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,015 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Quad Q9300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-2430M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9300 versus 3 GHz on the Core i5-2430M — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-2430M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9300 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-2430M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9300 scores 2,011 against the Core i5-2430M's 2,015 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-2430M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2430M.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Core i5-2430M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 256K (per core)+4167% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,011 | 2,015 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q9300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-2430M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Quad Q9300 versus 1333 on the Core i5-2430M — the Core i5-2430M supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P35,P45,X38,X48 (Core 2 Quad Q9300) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2430M).
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Core i5-2430M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | 1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9300) / true (Core i5-2430M). The Core i5-2430M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Quad Q9300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2430M rivals AMD A8-3500M.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Core i5-2430M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Quad Q9300 was priced at $266, while the Core i5-2430M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($266 vs $225), Core i5-2430M was $41 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9300 delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-2430M — making the Core i5-2430M the 16.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Core i5-2430M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $266 | $225-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | 9.0+18% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














