
Core 5 120UL

Core i5-13400F
Core 5 120UL vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 5 120UL vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 5 120UL vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core 5 120UL?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120UL vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, matching the Core i5-13400F's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 81.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12 | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz+92% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 10,558 | 25,029+137% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120UL) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 5 120UL was priced at $277, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($277 vs $196), Core i5-13400F was $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120UL delivers 38.1 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 108.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $277 | $196-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.1 | 127.7+235% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














