
Core 5 120UL

Core i7-9750H
Core 5 120UL vs Core i7-9750H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 5 120UL vs Core i7-9750H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 5 120UL vs Core i7-9750H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 10,611).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $277 MSRP, while Core i7-9750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i7-9750H
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120UL better than Core i7-9750H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120UL vs Core i7-9750H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-9750H
The Core i7-9750H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,611 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-9750H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 120UL has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9750H — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 120UL (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-9750H uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Core i7-9750H's 10,611 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-9750H. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i7-9750H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) |
| PassMark | 10,558 | 10,611 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-9750H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i7-9750H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













