
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Core 5 220H
2024Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core 5 220H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 797 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 802 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 628 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Core i7-12700K

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core i7-12700K's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-12700K uses Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Core i7-12700K's 34,347 — a 47.4% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 12 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+39% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 34,347+62% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-12700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 5 220H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












