
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Core 5 220H
2024Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core 5 220H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 970 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 689 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 829 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 404 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Core i7-13700K

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 73.4% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 16 / 24+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 45,784+116% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 31,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,846 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,980 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 5 220H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












