CPU
GPU
Core Duo T2400
Athlon II Neo K125
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Duo T2400 is positioned at rank 1205 and the Athlon II Neo K125 is on rank 982, so the Athlon II Neo K125 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2400
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II Neo K125
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Duo T2400 | Athlon II Neo K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($294) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Geneva (2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Duo T2400 | Athlon II Neo K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+195%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($294) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2400 and Athlon II Neo K125
Core Duo T2400
The Core Duo T2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,488 points. Launch price was $16.
Athlon II Neo K125
The Athlon II Neo K125 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,491 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core Duo T2400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II Neo K125 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core Duo T2400 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Core Duo T2400 versus 1.7 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K125 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2400. The Core Duo T2400 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon II Neo K125 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2400 scores 1,488 against the Athlon II Neo K125's 1,491 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II Neo K125.
| Feature | Core Duo T2400 | Athlon II Neo K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz+8% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.83 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Yonah (2005−2006) | Geneva (2010) |
| PassMark | 1,488 | 1,491 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Duo T2400 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II Neo K125 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2400 versus DDR3-800 on the Athlon II Neo K125 — the Athlon II Neo K125 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core Duo T2400) vs 0 (Athlon II Neo K125) — the Core Duo T2400 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 945GM,945PM (Core Duo T2400) and AMD ASB2 (Athlon II Neo K125).
| Feature | Core Duo T2400 | Athlon II Neo K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core Duo T2400) / not specified (Athlon II Neo K125). Primary use case: Core Duo T2400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2400 rivals Pentium T2310.
| Feature | Core Duo T2400 | Athlon II Neo K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Duo T2400 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Athlon II Neo K125 debuted at $100.
| Feature | Core Duo T2400 | Athlon II Neo K125 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294 | $100-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Duo T2400 and Athlon II Neo K125
