Core Duo T2400
VS
Core 2 Duo E6540

Core Duo T2400 vs Core 2 Duo E6540

Intel

Core Duo T2400

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2006
VS

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Duo T2400 is positioned at rank 1205 and the Core 2 Duo E6540 is on rank 1009, so the Core 2 Duo E6540 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2400

#1193
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5798%
#1194
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5713%
#1195
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5245%
#1196
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5221%
#1197
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5174%
#1199
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4996%
#1200
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4791%
#1201
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4783%
#1202
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4654%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
100%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
100%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
98%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
96%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
94%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
92%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
91%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
91%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
90%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
88%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6540

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
33993%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
32120%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
23322%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7026%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5565%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4868%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2788%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2752%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2506%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2506%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2478%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2411%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2377%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2367%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2346%
#1009
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
100%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
100%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
99%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
98%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
98%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
97%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
97%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
96%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
94%
#1020
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
94%
#1021
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
94%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
93%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
92%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Duo T2400 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo E6540 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Duo T2400Core 2 Duo E6540
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Duo E6540 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 95% cheaper ($15 vs $294) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore Duo T2400Core 2 Duo E6540
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1869%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2400 and Core 2 Duo E6540

Intel

Core Duo T2400

The Core Duo T2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,488 points. Launch price was $16.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6540

The Core 2 Duo E6540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It has 2 cores. Base frequency: 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,495 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Core Duo T2400 and Core 2 Duo E6540 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Core Duo T2400 is built on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Duo T2400 scores 1,488 against the Core 2 Duo E6540's 1,495 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6540. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core Duo T2400 vs 4 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo E6540.

FeatureCore Duo T2400Core 2 Duo E6540
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2
Boost Clock
1.83 GHz
Base Clock
1.83 GHz
2.33 GHz+27%
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
2 MB
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,488
1,495
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2400 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo E6540 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2400 versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6540 — the Core 2 Duo E6540 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6540 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 945GM,945PM (Core Duo T2400) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6540).

FeatureCore Duo T2400Core 2 Duo E6540
Socket
PGA478
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
1333+66550%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB+26214300%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core Duo T2400) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6540). Primary use case: Core Duo T2400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2400 rivals Pentium T2310; Core 2 Duo E6540 rivals Athlon 64 X2 6000+.

FeatureCore Duo T2400Core 2 Duo E6540
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Duo T2400 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E6540 debuted at $163.

FeatureCore Duo T2400Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP
$294
$163-45%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Release Date
2006
2007