CPU
GPU
Core Duo T2700
A10 Pro-7350B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Duo T2700 is positioned at rank 1233 and the A10 Pro-7350B is on rank 597, so the A10 Pro-7350B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2700
Performance Per Dollar A10 Pro-7350B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Duo T2700 | A10 Pro-7350B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($663) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Duo T2700 | A10 Pro-7350B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($663) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2700 and A10 Pro-7350B
Core Duo T2700
The Core Duo T2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,860 points. Launch price was $663.
A10 Pro-7350B
The A10 Pro-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,862 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core Duo T2700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A10 Pro-7350B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10 Pro-7350B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.33 GHz on the Core Duo T2700 versus 3.3 GHz on the A10 Pro-7350B — a 34.5% clock advantage for the A10 Pro-7350B (base: 2.33 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core Duo T2700 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the A10 Pro-7350B uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2700 scores 1,860 against the A10 Pro-7350B's 1,862 — a 0.1% lead for the A10 Pro-7350B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 200 vs 286, a 35.4% lead for the A10 Pro-7350B that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Core Duo T2700 | A10 Pro-7350B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.33 GHz | 3.3 GHz+42% |
| Base Clock | 2.33 GHz+11% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4096 kB+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 28 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Yonah (2005−2006) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,860 | 1,862 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 200 | 286+43% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 350 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Duo T2700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A10 Pro-7350B uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2700 versus DDR3-1600 on the A10 Pro-7350B — the A10 Pro-7350B supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10 Pro-7350B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core Duo T2700) vs 8 (A10 Pro-7350B) — the A10 Pro-7350B offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core Duo T2700 | A10 Pro-7350B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-1600+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core Duo T2700) vs AMD-V (A10 Pro-7350B). The A10 Pro-7350B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core Duo T2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Duo T2700 targets Laptop, A10 Pro-7350B targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2700 rivals Core 2 Duo T5600; A10 Pro-7350B rivals Core i5-4300U.
| Feature | Core Duo T2700 | A10 Pro-7350B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon R6 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Laptop | Business Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Duo T2700 and A10 Pro-7350B
