Core i3-10105 vs Opteron 6386 SE

Core i3-10105 vs Opteron 6386 SE Performance Spectrum

Core i3-10105

4 / 8

8,242

0.0%

8,291

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105 vs Opteron 6386 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105 vs Opteron 6386 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,270 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $1,392 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1034.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 67.6 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $1,392 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Opteron 6386 SE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,242 vs 8,291).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6386 SE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6386 SE

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 67.6 PassMark/$ ($1,392 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10105 better than Opteron 6386 SE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6386 SE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-10105 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6386 SE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10105 is the better buy right now. Core i3-10105 comes in $1,270 cheaper on MSRP at $122 MSRP versus $1,392 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Opteron 6386 SE is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 1034.2% better value on MSRP (67.6 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10105 vs Opteron 6386 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105

The Core i3-10105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,242 points. Launch price was $122.

Opteron 6386 SE

The Opteron 6386 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,291 points. Launch price was $2,408.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10105 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6386 SE offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6386 SE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105 versus 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 6386 SE — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i3-10105 uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6386 SE uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105 scores 8,242 against the Opteron 6386 SE's 8,291 — a 0.6% lead for the Opteron 6386 SE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6386 SE.

Feature	Core i3-10105	Opteron 6386 SE
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+26%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+32%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	16 MB+6300%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark	8,242	8,291

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6386 SE uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10105	Opteron 6386 SE
Socket	LGA1200	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105) / not specified (Opteron 6386 SE). The Core i3-10105 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6386 SE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10105 targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i3-10105	Opteron 6386 SE
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10105 was priced at $122, while the Opteron 6386 SE came in at $1392. On launch pricing ($122 vs $1392), Core i3-10105 was $1270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105 delivers 67.6 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Opteron 6386 SE — making the Core i3-10105 the 167.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-10105	Opteron 6386 SE
MSRP	$122-91%	$1392
Performance per Dollar	67.6+1027%	6.0
Release Date	2021	2012

Search Core i3-10105 on Amazon

Search Opteron 6386 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.