Core i3-10105 vs Core i5-1130G7

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105 vs Core i5-1130G7 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105 vs Core i5-1130G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-1130G7 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,242 vs 8,261).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Core i5-1130G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Core i5-1130G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10105 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10105 better than Core i5-1130G7?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-10105 is ahead with a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1130G7 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i5-1130G7 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1130G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10105 is the better buy right now. Core i3-10105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $122 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-1130G7 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (67.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10105 vs Core i5-1130G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105

The Core i3-10105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,242 points. Launch price was $122.

Core i5-1130G7

The Core i5-1130G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,261 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10105 and Core i5-1130G7 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105 versus 4 GHz on the Core i5-1130G7 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i3-10105 uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-1130G7 uses Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105 scores 8,242 against the Core i5-1130G7's 8,261 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-1130G7. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1130G7.

Feature	Core i3-10105	Core i5-1130G7
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+10%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+236%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	10 nm SuperFin-29%
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)
PassMark	8,242	8,261

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-1130G7 uses FCBGA1598 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10105	Core i5-1130G7
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1598
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105) / not specified (Core i5-1130G7). The Core i3-10105 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-1130G7 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10105 targets Desktop.