
Core i3-1305U

Core i3-10100F
Core i3-1305U vs Core i3-10100F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-1305U vs Core i3-10100F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-1305U vs Core i3-10100F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-1305U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i3-10100F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10100F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,634 vs 8,714).
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 15W vs 1W.
Core i3-10100F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $88 MSRP, while Core i3-1305U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i3-1305U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1305U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-10100F better than Core i3-1305U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1305U vs Core i3-10100F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1305U
The Core i3-1305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 8,634 points. Launch price was $309.

Core i3-10100F
The Core i3-10100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,714 points. Launch price was $122.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1305U packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-10100F offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i3-1305U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-1305U versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-10100F — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-1305U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-1305U uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i3-10100F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1305U scores 8,634 against the Core i3-10100F's 8,714 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-10100F. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i3-1305U vs 6 MB on the Core i3-10100F.
| Feature | Core i3-1305U | Core i3-10100F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6+25% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+5% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz+125% |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total)+67% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 8,634 | 8,714 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,388 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,900 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1305U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-10100F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i3-1305U versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10100F — the Core i3-1305U supports 95% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-10100F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i3-1305U) vs 16 (Core i3-10100F) — the Core i3-1305U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-U (Core i3-1305U) and Intel 400 series (Core i3-10100F).
| Feature | Core i3-1305U | Core i3-10100F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+95% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 128 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-1305U) / not specified (Core i3-10100F). The Core i3-1305U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i3-10100F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1305U targets Budget Laptop.
| Feature | Core i3-1305U | Core i3-10100F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













